ECC- European Congress of Cytology 2019

Start date
End date
Malmo, Sweden


The true value of ThinPrep® liquid-based cytology

Hologic offers a comprehensive and flexible cervical health screening solution, whatever your screening algorithm.

Visit our booth 1 and attend our Lunch Symposium on Monday 17 June at 13.00hrs in Congress Room Stortorget 1 to:

  • Learn why ThinPrep is the tested and trusted, gold standard LBC with economic, reproducibility and efficiency benefits1-9
  • Discover how Hologic can deliver all your cytology needs, GYN and Non-GYN, now and into the future
  • See our new ThinPrep® Genesis™* processor and ThinPrep Integrated Imager in action

We look forward to welcoming you to Booth 1 and to our lunch symposium.

Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn for updates throughout the congress.


* The ThinPrep® Genesis™ system is not FDA approved and is not for sale in the US.

References: 1. Ikenberg H, et al. Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1550–57. 2. Bernstein SJ, et al. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:308–317. 3. Abulafia O, et al. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gyn Oncol. 2003;90:137–144. 4. Hutchinson M, et al. Homogeneous Sampling Accounts for the Increased Diagnostic Accuracy Using the ThinPrep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;101(2):215–9. doi:10.1093/ajcp/101.2.215. 5. Lozano R. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(1):134–8. 6. Miller FS, et al. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35(4):213–7. 7. Klug SJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional cytology to liquid-based cytology and computer assistance. Int J Cancer. 2012;132(12):2849–57. doi:10.1002/ijc.27955. 8. Cox JT. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and application to present practice. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2004;Nov;2(6):597–611. 9. Karnon J, et al. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(20):iii,1-78.